Ferrari disappoints itself as soon as once more. In fashionable System 1, tire administration is a important issue for efficiency. Failing to optimize tire utilization considerably limits a workforce’s competitiveness, and through the first qualifying session of the Qatar weekend, Ferrari uncovered its vulnerabilities on this space. The problem, exacerbated by unexpectedly cool temperatures in comparison with these in Saudi Arabia, left the Maranello workforce unable to adapt successfully. The Q3 session served as a transparent instance, with the Ferrari drivers showing unsure about tips on how to proceed, compounded by inadequate help from the pit wall.
Within the sole apply session accessible, Ferrari targeted closely on balancing the automobile. They performed intensive laps utilizing the Exhausting compound to attain constant efficiency. For Qatar, the workforce opted for a medium-high downforce rear wing, a choice aligned with most different groups. Whereas not reaching the utmost doable degree, the setup was barely beneath optimum. Vital efforts had been additionally made to validate the up to date ground, that includes modifications across the edge. This improve was briefly examined by Carlos Sainz in Las Vegas through the first apply session, whereas in Losail, it was Charles Leclerc’s flip to trial it.
Inspired by constructive suggestions from automobile quantity 16, Ferrari determined to retain the up to date ground for qualifying and the Dash Race, with the choice to revert to the older specification if wanted. Through the restricted 60-minute session to fine-tune the automobiles, Charles Leclerc was instructed to carry out a number of managed laps on the Medium tires to check the ground. These runs, performed with out using aero rakes or flow-viz, relied solely on load cells. In the meantime, the Gentle compound remained largely untested, leaving questions on its efficiency for the Dash Qualifying session.
Throughout qualifying, each drivers complained about important rotation points, which proved to be the first impediment to unlocking efficiency. The automobiles suffered from understeer that transitioned into oversteer throughout nook exits. Whereas the automobiles did generate substantial downforce, a constructive takeaway for the Maranello workforce, the shortcoming to keep up the goal tire temperatures robbed them of important grip. This was an surprising setback for Ferrari, which had designed a warm-up technique that originally appeared efficient.
Including to the poor consequence was a setup that did not carry out optimally below the cooler circumstances. Ferrari was caught off guard, neglecting to make setup changes to counteract the dearth of rotation. As a substitute, they relied on knowledge gathered throughout FP1, satisfied that the precise tire administration technique would yield the specified efficiency. Sadly, this method proved ineffective, and as soon as once more, the 2 SF-24 automobiles displayed important untapped potential. Efficiency that might have made a distinction was left unrealized on account of poor execution.
McLaren demonstrated precisely what Ferrari was lacking: glorious steadiness, achieved by way of optimum tire administration. The MCL38 featured a pointy and exact front-end that labored harmoniously with the rear, sustaining steady alignment between the 2 axes. The McLaren automobiles dominated the primary two sectors of the monitor, whereas Verstappen claimed the quickest time within the third. McLaren’s tires activated extra rapidly—a attribute trait of the papaya automobile—whereas Ferrari opted for a delayed activation technique, aiming to profit from higher grip throughout the remainder of the lap.
With the Gentle compounds, nevertheless, Ferrari tried to regulate preliminary tire temperatures to enhance efficiency within the first sector. This method backfired, resulting in front-end overheating and exacerbating the rotation points beforehand famous. McLaren additionally confronted challenges stabilizing tire temperatures however finally succeeded, whereas for Ferrari, this process become a nightmare, derailing their total technique through the important moments of the session. With restricted time and already-used tires, there was no alternative for Ferrari to recuperate.
Mercedes as soon as once more delivered a formidable efficiency, significantly by way of George Russell, aided by the cooler monitor temperature of simply 21.5°C. These circumstances helped the W15 mitigate overheating points successfully. Sooner tire activation through the out-lap supplied higher grip over a single lap, permitting Russell’s automobile to outperform the SF-24 by way of outright efficiency. Moreover, Russell’s exact dealing with performed a vital position in extracting the automobile’s potential.
Lastly, Crimson Bull. Max Verstappen admitted he wasn’t quick sufficient through the session. The RB20’s major difficulty was its steadiness. Through the sole apply session, the workforce struggled to search out an optimum working window for the automobile. Verstappen didn’t pinpoint a single drawback however famous understeer in some corners and over-rotation in others, with the entrance and rear axes disconnected—a recurring difficulty in current weeks. Total, the compromise Crimson Bull settled on proved much less efficient than the setups chosen by Ferrari and McLaren.
— see video above —
Purchase official Ferrari F1 merchandise!
Let different Scuderia Followers learn about us
